home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- ORDER LIST
-
- MONDAY, MAY 23, 1994
-
-
- CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION
-
- 93-883 ICC, ET AL. V. OVERLAND EXPRESS, INC.
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
- The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
-
- United States Court of Appeals for the District of
-
- Columbia Circuit for further consideration in light of
-
- Security Services, Inc. v. Kmart Corporation, 511 U. S.
-
- (1994). Justice Ginsburg took no part in the
-
- consideration or decision of this case.
-
- 93-1129 COTTER & COMPANY V. BRIZENDINE, ROBERT
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
- The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
-
- United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
-
- for further consideration in light of Security Services,
-
- Inc. v. Kmart Corporation, 511 U. S. (1994).
-
-
-
-
- ORDERS IN PENDING CASES
-
- D-1336 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF WAYNE JEFFREY PRICE
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Wayne
-
- Jeffrey Price, of Brooklyn, New York, has been disbarred
-
- from the practice of law by the Appellate Division,
-
- Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department, and
-
- this Court by order of December 13, 1993, having
-
- suspended the said Wayne Jeffrey Price from the practice
-
- of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue
-
- requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly
-
- issued;
-
- It is ordered that the said Wayne Jeffrey Price be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1349 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF GARRY MICHAEL COOPER
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Garry
-
- Michael Cooper, of Houston, Texas, has been suspended
-
- from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Texas
-
- and this Court by order of January 10, 1994, having
-
- suspended the said Garry Michael Cooper from the
-
- practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule
-
- issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Garry Michael Cooper be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1359 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF NEIL WARREN STEINHORN
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Neil
-
- Warren Steinhorn, of Baltimore, Maryland, has been
-
- disbarred from the practice of law by the Court of
-
- Appeals of Maryland and this Court by order of February
-
- 22, 1994, having suspended the said Neil Warren
-
- Steinhorn from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause
-
- why he should not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Neil Warren Steinhorn
-
- be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1360 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF BRUCE PROVDA
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Bruce
-
- Provda, of Floral Park, New York, has been suspended
-
- from the practice of law by the Appellate Division,
-
- Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department,
-
- and this Court by order of February 22, 1994, having
-
- suspended the said Bruce Provda from the practice of law
-
- in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring
-
- him to show cause why he should not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Bruce Provda be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1364 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF BRUCE A. HERRING
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Bruce A.
-
- Herring, of Placentia, California, has been disbarred
-
- from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of
-
- California and this Court by order of February 22, 1994,
-
- having suspended the said Bruce A. Herring from the
-
- practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule
-
- issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Bruce A. Herring be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1366 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF A. KARL STEVENS, JR.
-
- It having been reported to the Court that A. Karl
-
- Stevens, Jr., of Tampa, Florida, has resigned from the
-
- practice of law before the Supreme Court of Ohio and
-
- this Court by order of February 22, 1994, having
-
- suspended the said A. Karl Stevens, Jr., from the
-
- practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule
-
- issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said A. Karl Stevens, Jr., be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1372 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MICHAEL I. SMITH
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Michael
-
- I. Smith, of Washington, D. C., has resigned from the
-
- practice of law before the Appellate Division, Supreme
-
- Court of New York, First Judicial Department, and this
-
- Court by order of March 21, 1994, having suspended the
-
- said Michael I. Smith from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to
-
- show cause why he should not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly
-
- issued;
-
- It is ordered that the said Michael I. Smith be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1376 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JACK NATH
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Jack
-
- Nath, of New Hyde Park, New York, has resigned from the
-
- practice of law before the Appellate Division, Supreme
-
- Court of New York, Second Judicial Department, and this
-
- Court by order of March 28, 1994, having suspended the
-
- said Jack Nath from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause
-
- why he should not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Jack Nath be disbarred
-
- from the practice of law in this Court and that his name
-
- be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to
-
- practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1391 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF WILLIAM CASTRO
-
- It is ordered that William Castro, of Miami,
-
- Florida, be suspended from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty
-
- days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1392 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF CARTER BLEDSOE
-
- It is ordered that Carter Bledsoe, of McLean,
-
- Virginia, be suspended from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty
-
- days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1393 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ERIO M. COMICI
-
- It is ordered that Erio M. Comici, of Chesterfield,
-
- Missouri, be suspended from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty
-
- days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1394 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF NORMAN C. FARHAT
-
- It is ordered that Norman C. Farhat, of Farmington
-
- Hills, Michigan, be suspended from the practice of law
-
- in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within
-
- forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should
-
- not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1395 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF LAWRENCE D. MORINGIELLO
-
- It is ordered that Lawrence D. Moringiello, of
-
- Brooklyn, New York, be suspended from the practice of
-
- law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable
-
- within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he
-
- should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this
-
- Court.
-
- D-1396 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOSEPH G. CAIRO, JR.
-
- It is ordered that Joseph G. Cairo, Jr., of Corona
-
- Village, New York, be suspended from the practice of law
-
- in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within
-
- forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should
-
- not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- 93-823 NEBRASKA DEPT. OF REVENUE V. LOEWENSTEIN, JOHN
-
- The motion of Federal Reserve Bank of New York for
-
- leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The
-
- motion of Council of State Governments, et al. for leave
-
- to file a brief as amici curiae is granted.
-
- 93-1260 UNITED STATES V. LOPEZ, ALFONSO
-
- 93-1318 ICC V. TRANSCON LINES, ET AL.
-
- The motions of the Solicitor General to dispense
-
- with printing the joint appendices are granted.
-
- 93-1341 WEST PENN POWER CO., ET AL. V. PA PUB. UTL. COMMN., ET AL.
-
- The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in
-
- this case expressing the views of the United States.
-
- 93-7745 JOHNSON, CARL I. V. JOHNSON, THERESA M.
-
- The motion of petitioner for reconsideration of the
-
- order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis is
-
- denied.
-
- 93-8569 IN RE FRED WHITAKER
-
- The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis is denied. See Rule 39.8. Petitioner is
-
- allowed until June 13, 1994, within which to pay the
-
- docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a
-
- petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this
-
- Court.
-
-
-
- CERTIORARI GRANTED
-
- 93-1199 STONE, MARVIN V. INS
-
- 93-1525 LEBRON, MICHAEL V. NATL. RR PASSENGER CORP.
-
- The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.
-
- 93-1504 CELOTEX CORPORATION V. EDWARDS, BENNIE, ET UX.
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted
-
- limited to the following question: "Whether Rule 65.1 of
-
- the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows enforcement
-
- of a supersedeas bond, posted to stay execution of
-
- judgment against a defendant that filed for
-
- reorganization after the judgment became final, against
-
- the non-bankrupt surety that issued the bond, even
-
- though a bankruptcy court in another circuit has
-
- attempted to restrain execution on supersedeas bonds
-
- posted in favor of the debtor under section 105(a) of
-
- the Bankruptcy Code."
-
- 93-1543 McKENNON, CHRISTINE V. NASHVILLE BANNER PUBLISHING
-
- The motion of American Association of Retired
-
- Persons, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici
-
- curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari
-
- is granted.
-
-
- CERTIORARI DENIED
-
- 93-683 SECURITY SERVICES, ETC. V. GARVEY CORP., ET AL.
-
- 93-792 SILVEY REFRIGERATED CARRIERS V. H.J. HEINZ COMPANY
-
- 93-1133 GRAY, MAINE, ET AL. V. TRI-STATE RUBBISH, ET AL.
-
- 93-1215 MITCHELL ARMS, INC. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-1230 SCHNEIDER, DAVID V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-1265 DOUGHARTY, GARY V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-1335 SECURITY SERVICES, INC. V. JOHN H. HARLAND CO.
-
- 93-1403 ARTHUR, PEARL, ET AL. V. BELL ATLANTIC CORP., ET AL.
-
- 93-1470 METZGER, TOM, ET AL. V. BERHANU, ENGEDAW
-
- 93-1505 TRI-STATE RUBBISH, INC. V. AUBURN, MAINE, ET AL.
-
- 93-1508 MOSELEY, THOMAS, ET UX. V. GEORGIA, ET AL.
-
- 93-1526 NELSON, MICHAEL V. NELSON, PATRICIA
-
- 93-1527 ROGERS, HENRY LEON V. INVERNESS, FLORIDA, ET AL.
-
- 93-1528 CLARK, THOMAS V. BALTIMORE MUNICIPAL, ET AL.
-
- 93-1536 EJAY TRAVEL, INC., ET AL. V. ALGEMEEN BURGERLIJK, ETC.
-
- 93-1537 KEHS, ROBERT, ET AL. V. FOSTER, LARRY EUGENE, ET AL.
-
- 93-1541 ) HALL, FRANCES V. HALL, RICHARD
- )
- 93-1542 ) CAMOSCIO, FRANK V. HALL, RICHARD
-
- 93-1545 RUSCITTI, EMILIANO, ET AL. V. FARMERS INS. EXCHANGE
-
- 93-1546 RAY, WILLIAM V. PEABODY INSTITUTE, ETC.
-
- 93-1548 JOHNSON, DeETTA, ETC. V. METHODIST MED. CENTER OF IL
-
- 93-1549 WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NY V. CT COMMR. OF TRANSP., ET AL.
-
- 93-1553 BOYD, HENRY V. GOOLSBY, AARON, ET AL.
-
- 93-1557 LAMB, CARL V. UNION CARBIDE CORP.
-
- 93-1558 SPRANGER, EDWARD V. RUNYON, POSTMASTER GEN.
-
- 93-1574 McNARON, CURTIS V. BROWN, SEC. OF VA
-
- 93-1580 KRUG, GREGORY V. AMBROSE, WILSON, ET AL.
-
- 93-1590 HARPER, NORMAN V. HARPER, JOAN
-
- 93-1600 EGB ASSOC., INC., ET AL. V. TCBY SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL.
-
- 93-1601 BACHTEL, RICHARD, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-1605 ALLIED VAN LINES V. OBERG, GERALD, ET AL.
-
- 93-1611 WHITMAN, CHRISTINE, ET AL. V. DONOGHUE, DAVID, ET AL.
-
- 93-1616 GUZMAN, PAUL V. HUDSON, DIR., U.S. MARSHALS
-
- 93-1641 DOE, JOHN, ETC., ET AL. V. TULLAHOMA CITY SCH., ET AL.
-
- 93-1646 FORESTWOOD FARMS, INC. V. NLRB
-
- 93-1648 KAMIENSKI, PAUL V. NEW JERSEY
-
- 93-1664 WILLIAMS, WOODROW, ET UX. V. STEWART, JAMES, ETC.
-
- 93-1668 CROWELL, MELANIE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-1680 CONTRERAS-SUBIAS, JOSE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-1694 ADAMS, TERRY V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-6253 ALLUM, ROBERT V. SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT CT.
-
- 93-7583 BLACK, EARL S. V. COLORADO
-
- 93-7699 KARIM-PANAHI, PARVIZ V. UNITED STATES, ET AL.
-
- 93-7826 GEERY, DANIEL V. USDC FOR IDAHO
-
- 93-7849 BARFIELD, RICHARD WAYNE V. SEC., NC DEPT. CRIME CONTROL
-
- 93-7856 BENNETT, TOSSIE V. BORG, WARDEN
-
- 93-7871 DUPARD, RONALD J. V. JARVIS, KAREN L., ET AL.
-
- 93-7935 KOWALCZYK, CHESTER V. THOMPSON, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 93-7979 LOWERY, KEVIN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-8006 MENA, TRISTAN V. CALIFORNIA
-
- 93-8035 GOINS, ERIC L. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-8049 BALOG, NICHOLAS V. SHALALA, SEC. OF H&HS
-
- 93-8070 MIKHAIL, MICHAEL A. V. RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD
-
- 93-8208 ISRAEL, AMAZIAH D. V. USDC MD FL
-
- 93-8255 STREETER, SAMUEL CHARLES V. ALABAMA
-
- 93-8295 WARREN, GERALD V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-8299 STARKEY, LLOYD RAY V. HENDERSON, BRYAN
-
- 93-8428 CULP, JOHN L. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-8474 SHERMAN, RICHARD V. COMMUNITY CONSOLIDATED DIST.
-
- 93-8509 MURPHY, TERRENCE V. WESTCHESTER, ET AL.
-
- 93-8512 MAXWELL, ANTHONY V. ARVONIO, PATRICK
-
- 93-8513 LOPEZ, FRANK C. V. CALIFORNIA
-
- 93-8517 MEEKS, EDWARD E. V. CALIFORNIA
-
- 93-8527 RAY, CANDIS O. V. ERVIN, SAM J., ET AL.
-
- 93-8529 PRESSLEY, TERRY K. V. MEDLOCK, T. TRAVIS
-
- 93-8530 PAYNE, RICHARD V. ESCAMBIA COUNTY SHERIFF
-
- 93-8532 MEDINA, JERRY V. CALIFORNIA
-
- 93-8533 WILSON, EARL V. SANDERS, WARDEN
-
- 93-8537 DRAPER, JOHN CLINT V. GUNN, B. S., ET AL.
-
- 93-8538 LUCERO, PEDRO V. CALIFORNIA
-
- 93-8541 D'AMARIO, ARTHUR V. O'NEIL, ATTY. GEN. OF RI
-
- 93-8548 WILLIAMS, THOMAS V. SINGLETARY, DIR., FL DOC
-
- 93-8560 FRANKLIN, JEFFERY B. V. ENNIS POLICE DEPT., ET AL.
-
- 93-8561 REYNOLDS, ALMUS L. V. CALIFORNIA
-
- 93-8566 WALKER, GARY V. JONES, WARDEN
-
- 93-8567 TUCKER, TERRY JAMES V. NINK, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 93-8568 TOY, EDGAR V. FLORIDA
-
- 93-8574 LEWIS, LEON V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-8584 DUKOVICH, DENNIS STEPHEN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-8588 EWELL, STACY L., ET AL. V. MURRAY, DIR., VA DOC, ET AL.
-
- 93-8591 GIPSON, FAITDON V. CALIFORNIA
-
- 93-8594 JORDAN, CARL M. V. ALABAMA
-
- 93-8595 KLEINSCHMIDT, MARIE, ET AL. V. LIBERTY MUTUAL INS., ET AL.
-
- 93-8598 MITCHELL, JERRY L. V. OSBORNE, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 93-8600 MACIEL, JAMES D. V. GOMEZ, DIR., CA DOC, ET AL.
-
- 93-8602 RICHARDS, JUSTO V. BARTLETT, SUPT., ELMIRA
-
- 93-8605 GRECO, LOUIS V. NELSON, SUPT., BAY STATE
-
- 93-8629 SLOAN, ISMAIL V. ROBERTS, CHARLES, ET AL.
-
- 93-8639 JEFFRESS, JESSE W. V. BROWN, SEC. OF VA
-
- 93-8660 THOMPSON, JAMES V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-8661 VOIGT, GAIL ANNETTE V. LEWIS, DIR., AZ DOC
-
- 93-8668 GRIFFITH, KENRICK V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-8693 BRANHAM, VERNON LEE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-8696 BARNUM, HERMAN LEE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-8726 LeBLANC, J. E. V. SHALALA, SEC. OF HHS
-
- 93-8734 RAU, RICHARD V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-8763 KAPLAN, HOWARD J. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-8764 FORREST, TIMOTHY W. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-8765 KANU, GODWIN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-8773 FIALLO, MANUEL R. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-8779 ATAMANTYK, MICHAEL S. V. DEPT. OF DEFENSE
-
- 93-8781 KELLY, JOSEPH C. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-8784 COLVIN, JEWEL L. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-8786 McKAY, THOMAS V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-8790 MESSER, ALAN L. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-8791 LEE, HENRY V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-8794 McQUEEN, ROGER V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-8797 McKNIGHT, SHAWN P. V. IOWA
-
- 93-8806 GHOLSTON, CHARLES O. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-8808 MARSHALL, KENNETH B. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-8812 JACKSON, LORENZO V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-8814 DIAZ, HECTOR SAMUEL MARTINEZ V. VIRGIN ISLANDS
-
- 93-8817 HANKERSON, CLEVELAND V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-8821 LEE, DEMETRIUS V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-8826 SANTANA, CARLOS SANCHEZ V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-8835 DRESSLER, JOACHIM E. V. WISCONSIN
-
- 93-8845 PHELPS, COY R. V. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
-
- 93-8847 BROWN, JAY V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-8850 DIZON, GEORGE MANUEL V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-8856 SALCEDO, JOSE E. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-8857 BALL, BYRON ROBERT V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-8862 GREGG, STEVEN D. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-8863 FREDETTE, ZACHARY S., ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-8878 ANTHONY, CARL V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-8888 PAGE, DANA B. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-8889 MENDEZ, REYNALDO V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-8892 CAZARES-BARRAGAN, GERARDO V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-8904 HEILIG, HARRY L. V. UNITED STATES
-
- The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.
-
- 93-1533 PHILLIPS PET. CO. V. ROBERTSON OIL CO.
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
-
- Justice O'Connor took no part in the consideration or
-
- decision of this petition.
-
-
-
- 93-1563 NORTHBROOK PROP. INS. CO. V. EDWARDS, BENNIE, ET UX.
-
- The motion of Northbrook Property Insurance Company
-
- for leave to intervene is denied. The motion of
-
- Northbrook Property Insurance Company for leave to file
-
- a brief as amicus curiae in No. 93-1504, Celotex
-
- Corporation v. Edwards, is granted. The petition for a
-
- writ of certiorari is dismissed.
-
- 93-5893 WILLIAMSON, RONALD KEITH V. OKLAHOMA
-
- 93-7957 BELTRAN-LOPEZ, MAURICIO V. FLORIDA
-
- 93-8089 TOWNS, TERRANCE V. ILLINOIS
-
- 93-8229 ARBELAEZ, GUILLERMO V. FLORIDA
-
- 93-8376 SAM, THAVIRAK V. PENNSYLVANIA
-
- The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.
-
- Justice Blackmun dissenting:
-
- Adhering to my view that the death penalty cannot
-
- be imposed fairly within the constraints of our
-
- Constitution, see my dissent in Callins v. Collins, 510
-
- U.S. , (1994), I would grant certiorari and
-
- vacate the death sentences in these cases.
-
-
- MANDAMUS DENIED
-
- 93-8547 IN RE NOLAN L. JAMES
-
- 93-8616 IN RE E. LEE BEAUMONT
-
- The petitions for writs of mandamus are denied.
-
-
- REHEARINGS DENIED
-
- 93-6630 MURPHY, JAMES L. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-7108 SEMIEN, BENJAMIN V. SHALALA, SEC., H&HS
-
- 93-7696 GANT, ROBERT L. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-7813 ADAMS, CARL B. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 93-7820 WATSON, JOHNNY BELL V. MORRIS, DOROTHY, ET AL.
-
- 93-7892 STEEL, JOHN V. WACHTLER, SOL, ET AL.
-
- 93-7948 KENNEDY, MICHAEL A. V. COLLINS, DIR., TX DCJ
-
- The petitions for rehearing are denied.
-
- 93-423 KATSIS, STAVROS V. INS
-
- 93-7501 MALDONADO, GEORGE V. UNITED STATES
-
- The motions for leave to file a petition for
-
- rehearing are denied.
-
- 93-7002 CAMPBELL, CHARLES R. V. WOOD, SUPT., ET AL.
-
- The petition for rehearing is denied.
-
- Justice Blackmun dissents from the denial
-
- of rehearing. He would grant the petition
-
- for rehearing, grant the petition for
-
- certiorari, and vacate petitioner's death
-
- sentence. See Callins v. Collins, 510 U.S.
-
- , (1994).
-
-
- RECESS ORDER
-
- The Court will take a recess from Monday,
-
- May 23, 1994, until Tuesday, May 31, 1994.
-
-
-
- MOTIONS FOR ADMISSION
-
- The written motions for admission of the following
-
- lawyers to the Bar of this Court are granted:
-
-